The Influence of
Work Discipline, Work Motivation, and Organizational Commitment on the
Performance Of Employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office
Mutiara Azzahra1, Herry Krisnandi2,
Kumba Digdowiseiso3
1,2,3 Faculty Economy and Business, Jakarta National University,
Indonesia
Email: 1[email protected], 2[email protected],
3*[email protected]
Abstrak
This study aims to
analyze the effect of work discipline, work motivation, and organizational
commitment on the performance of DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office
employees. The method of analysis in this study is descriptive analysis and
inferential analysis. Data analysis through several tests, namely the research
instrument test, classical assumption test, model feasibility test (F test),
multiple linear analysis, and hypothesis testing (t-test). The population in
this study were permanent employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education
Office with a total of 150 employees, the number of samples in this study was
109 employees with data collection techniques through questionnaires. The
results of the regression analysis in this study indicate that there is a
positive and significant effect of work discipline, work motivation, and work
commitment on the performance of DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office
employees. The contribution of work discipline, work motivation, and
organizational commitment affected the performance of DKI Jakarta Provincial
Education Office employees, namely 0.638 or 63.8%, while the remaining 36.2%
was explained by other variable factors that were not included in this study.
Keywords: Work Discipline, Work Motivation, Organizational Commitment, Employee
Performance
INTRODUCTION
The era of globalization is defined as an era
of rapid change in the global environment. At this time the impact on human
life in all walks of life is enormous. Increasingly fierce competition in all
areas of life, especially in the business world, forces companies to keep up
with the changes that occur. At this point, of course, the company needs a variety
of effective strategies to advance its company. The progress of a company can
be seen from its human resources. In other words, human resources play a very
important role in the development of a company.
Ardana, Mujiati, & Sriathi (2012) stated
that "Human resources are valuable and beneficial assets for the company
because the success or failure in the course of the company is determined by
the human element". Human resources are an important aspect of a company.
Of course, the human resources (employees) needed by the company must have a
superior quality that meets the qualifications needed by the company. The
quality possessed by every human resource is an indispensable potential to
support the company's operations in carrying out its daily activities and
achieving its goals (Frimayasa & Lawu, 2020).
The achievement of a company's goals to meet
targets is certainly related to the role of human resources in it. Human
resources (employees) needed by the company are those who have good
performance. Kasmir (2016) said, "Performance is the result of work and
work behavior achieved from the responsibilities carried out in a certain
period". Employees who have good performance can be seen from the results
of the work they complete by the employee performance targets (SKP) that have
been set by the company.
One of the challenges of a company is how to
improve the performance of its employees. Performance is influenced by several
factors, namely: (1) Leadership, (2) Work Environment, (3) Leadership Style,
(4) Work Motivation, (5) Personality, (6) Ability and Expertise, (7) Work
Design, (8) Commitment, (9) Job Satisfaction, (10) Knowledge, (11) Loyalty,
(12) Organizational Culture, (13) Work Discipline (Kasmir, 2016).
Employee performance is trying to be improved,
including by affirming the attitude of Work Discipline. A company to achieve
its goals certainly requires employees who have a high work discipline
attitude. Work discipline is an attitude that is carried out consciously to
comply with the rules, norms, and policies made by the company. According to
Sutrisno (2016) "Discipline is a person's behavior by regulations,
existing work procedures or discipline is attitudes, behaviors, and actions
that are by the regulations of the organization both written and
unwritten".
An employee who has a work discipline attitude
certainly has a high responsibility for their work, they tend to complete their
work effectively and efficiently. So, the company needs to have employees who
have a high attitude of work discipline. Conversely, if employees do not have a
work discipline attitude, the company will find it difficult to achieve its
goals.
In addition to work
discipline, other factors are thought to affect employee performance, namely
work motivation. Work motivation is a factor or thing that encourages someone
to do or do certain activities, therefore motivation is often referred to as a
driving factor for one's behavior (Sutrisno, 2016).
Employees who have high work motivation tend to
do their work with all their strength trying to give their best so that the
tasks completed produce maximum results. This work motivation is an employee's
encouragement to carry out activities consciously. Employees who have high work
motivation will improve performance, in addition to work motivation factors,
organizational commitment is thought to also affect employee performance.
Every human being is required to have a high
commitment, a commitment that must be obeyed while working in a company Umam
(2010). Organizational commitment means strong employee loyalty to the
organization/institution, so it does not think at all to leave the institution
whatever the circumstances The level of sincerity of an employee can be seen
from his commitment to carry out his duties and functions in a company. If
employees have a minimal commitment to their work, the performance that will
automatically be shown is very low (Indah and Puspari, 2021).
Research related to the influence of work
discipline, work motivation, and organizational commitment on employee
performance has been widely researched before. Based on research conducted by
Ipan Hilmawan (2020) entitled "The Influence of Work Discipline,
Organizational Commitment and Teamwork on Employee Performance at the Serang
Regency Ministry of Religious Affairs". The results of the study stated
that work discipline and organizational commitment had a positive and
significant influence on employee performance at the Serang Regency Ministry of
Religious Affairs.
According to Sari, Hestini, and Haryani (2020)
in their research, work discipline, work motivation, and organizational
commitment have a positive effect on the performance of West Semarang District
Office employees. This research is contrary to research conducted by Risky Nur
Adha, et al (2019) the results showed that work motivation variables did not
affect the performance of Jember Regency Social Service employees. In addition,
it is also contrary to research conducted by Marita Diansyah, et al (2020) in
her journal entitled "The Influence of Competence, Organizational
Commitment, and Motivation on the Performance of Bima City Education and
Culture Office Employees". The results showed that organizational
commitment did not have a significant effect on the performance of employees of
the Bima City Education and Culture Office.
Based on the background that has been
described, the author formulates the problems underlying this study as follows:
1) Does work discipline affect the performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office? 2) Does work motivation affect the performance of
employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office? 3) Whether
organizational commitment affect the performance of employees of the DKI
Jakarta Provincial Education Office?
Based on the formulation of the problem that
has been described, the objectives of this study are: a) To analyze the effect
of work discipline on the performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office. b) To analyze the effect of work motivation on the
performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office. c) To
analyze the effect of organizational commitment on the performance of employees
of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office. The results of this research
are expected to be useful and can be used as evaluation material to improve
employee performance, as well as material to manage existing human resources,
especially related to work discipline, work motivation, and work commitment.
RESEARCH METHOD
The object of research in this study is employee performance which is
influenced by work discipline, work motivation, and organizational commitment
where the study is carried out at the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office
within the period of the study carried out in October 2022 until it is
completed. The data sources used in this study are primary data sources.
Primary data is data made by researchers for a specific purpose, the purpose is
to solve problems in this study. The primary data used in this study was in the
form of results from questionnaires or questionnaires distributed to all
respondents. The respondents were permanent employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office.
The type of data used
in this study is quantitative data. According to Sugiyono (2017),
"Quantitative data is research data in the form of numbers that will be
measured using statistics as a calculation test tool, related to the problem
under study to produce a conclusion". Population is a generalized area
consisting of objects or subjects that have certain qualities and
characteristics determined by researchers to be studied and then draw
conclusions (Sugiyono, 2017). According to Arikunto (2013), "population is
the whole subject of research.
If one wants to
examine all the elements in the research area, then the research is population
research. His study or research is also called population study or census
study". The population referred to in this study is permanent employees of
the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office which amounts to 150 employees.
Based on the opinion of Sugiyono (2017), the definition of a sample is
"part of the number and characteristics possessed by the population".
The population in this study is permanent employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office which amounts to 150 employees.
Sampling techniques
are divided into two techniques, namely probability (Probability Sampling) and
non-probability (NonProbability Sampling). The technique used in this study is
the probability technique. Exposure (Sugiyono, 2017) to probability techniques
is "a sampling technique that provides equal opportunities for each member
of the population to be selected into a sample". The probability technique
used, namely simple random sampling, is a sampling technique that is taken
randomly without paying attention to strata in this population. To determine
the minimum sample number required, when the population size is known.
In this study, the
author used a collection technique with questionnaires. According to Sugiyono
(2017) explained that "Questionnaire is a data collection technique
carried out by giving a set of questions or written statements to respondents
for them to answer. The questionnaire uses a Likert scale consisting of various
questions related to work discipline, work motivation, and organizational
commitment to employee performance using 5 categories�.
Classical Assumption Test Results
Normality Test Results
Figure 1 Normality Test
Results
Based on Figure 1 above, it can be seen that the
distribution of relative points follows the direction of the diagonal line and
is around the diagonal line, so it can be assumed that the residual data in
this regression model is normally distributed.
Tabel 1 One-Sample
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
|
|
Unstandardized Residual |
|
|
N |
|
109 |
|
Normal Parameters,b |
Mean |
,0000000 |
|
|
Std. Deviation |
1,86563006 |
|
Most Extreme Differences |
Absolute |
,075 |
|
Positive |
,038 |
|
|
|
Negative |
-,075 |
|
Test Statistic |
|
,075 |
|
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
,160c |
a. Test distribution
is Normal.
|
b.
Calculated from data. |
|
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction. |
Sumber: Hasil Pengolahan SPSS 23
Based on the
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample table above, it can be seen that the value of
Asymp.Sig 2-tailed is 0.160. Since the value of Asymp.Sig 2-tailed is greater
than the significance value of 0.05 (0.160 > 0.05), and the residual value
is normally distributed.
Multicollinearity Test
Table 2 Multicholinerity
Test Coefficients
|
Model |
Collinearity
Statistics |
||
|
Tolerance |
BRIGHT |
||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
|
|
|
|
Work Discipline |
,447 |
2,236 |
|
|
Work Motivation |
,552 |
1,812 |
|
|
Organizational Commitment |
,681 |
1,469 |
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Pegawai
Sumber: Hasil Pengolahan SPSS 23
The
criteria for testing multicollinearity is that if the tolerance value is
greater than 0.1 and the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) is smaller than 10,
then multicollinearity does not occur in this regression model. It can be seen
from the results attached to Table 4.12 that the variance inflation factor
(VIF) values of the three independent variables, namely Work Discipline, Work
Motivation, and Organizational Commitment are 2.236, 1.812, and 1.469 smaller
than 10, and the tolerance values of the three variables 0.447, 0.552, and
0.681 are greater than the value of 0.1 so that it can be said that between
independent variables there is no multicollinearity problem in this regression
model.
Heteroscedasticity Test
The heteroscedasticity test was
conducted to see whether there were heteroscedasticity deviations in this
regression model and whether the regression model in this study had variance
inequalities from the residuals of one observer to another. A good regression
model does not occur heteroscedasticity.
Figure 2 Heteroscedasticity Test Results
Based on Figure 2 of
the scatterplot graph, it can be seen that the point spread does not form a
clear pattern or regular pattern and the point spreads below and above number 0
on the Y axis. With this, it can be concluded that the regression model in this
study does not have heteroscedasticity problems.
Table 3 Glajer
Heteroskedasticity Test
|
Variable |
Sig |
Conclusion |
|
Work Discipline (X1) |
0,897 |
No
Hesterocedacity |
|
Work Motivation (X2) |
0,209 |
No
Hesterocedacity |
|
Organizational Commitment (X3) |
0,278 |
No
Hesterocedacity |
Source: SPSS 23 Processing Results
In the Glajer
Heteroskedasticity Test, it can be said that there is no heteroskedasticity
problem if the signification value is greater than 0.05 (>0.05). Based on
Table 4.13 above, it can be seen that the significance values of the variables
studied of 0.897, 0.209, and 0.278 are greater than 0.05, which means that in
the variables of Work Discipline, Work Motivation, and Organizational
Commitment to Employee Performance there is no Hesterokedasticity problem.
The
Automobile
The
autocorrelation test is seen from the Durbin-Watson test (DW test) which aims
to determine whether or not there are deviations from classical assumptions,
autocorrelation is a correlation or relationship that occurs between residual
observers with one observer in this regression model. The autocorrelation test
results are attached to the following Durbin-Watson test table:
Table 4 Uji
Durbin-Watson (DW Test) Model Summary
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error
of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
|
1 |
,799a |
,638 |
,628 |
1,892 |
1,945 |
a. Predictors: (Constant),
Organizational Commitment, Work Motivation, Work Discipline
b. Dependent Variable:
Employee Performance
Sumber: Hasil Pengolahan SPSS 23
Based on Table 4 above, the Durbin-Watson value is
1.945. Durbin Watson values according to the table with n = 109 respondents and
k = 3 (number of independent variables) obtained numbers dl = 1.631 and du =
1.744. Therefore the DW value is calculated > du (1.945 > 1.744), In
addition, the Durbin Watson value is between du < d < 4-du or 1.744 <
1.945 < 2.256, so it can be concluded that in this regression model it is
symptom-free autocorrelation. Then, this model is worth using.
Double
Linear Regression Analysis
Multiple linear regression analysis is performed in
this study to see the relationship between two or more dependent variables with
the independent variable and to predict the value of the independent variable
if the value of the dependent variable decreases or increases. This study shows
the influence of Work Discipline (X1), Work Motivation (X2), and Organizational
Commitment (X3) on Employee Performance variables (Y). In this study, the
author uses statistical calculations for regression analysis with the help of
SPSS software version 23 as follows:
Table 5
Coefficients Double Linear Regression Analysis
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
3,190 |
1,550 |
|
2,058 |
,042 |
|
|
Disiplin
Kerja |
,313 |
,062 |
,444 |
5,059 |
,000 |
|
|
Motivasi
Kerja |
,221 |
,054 |
,323 |
4,083 |
,000 |
|
|
Komitmen Organisasi |
,146 |
,066 |
,158 |
2,225 |
,028 |
a. Dependent Variable:
Kinerja Pegawai
Sumber: Hasil Pengolahan SPSS 23
Based on Table 5 above, a multiple linear
regression equation model is obtained as follows:
KP
= 0,444 DK + 0,323 MK + 0,158 KO
Keterangan:
KP����� = Kinerja Pegawai
DK����� = Work Discipline
MK���� = Work Motivation
KO����� = Organizational Commitment b1, b2, b3������� = Koefisien Regresi
From the regression model above, these numbers can
be drawn as follows:
a. The variable Work discipline (X1) has a
regression coefficient value of 0.444. This means, showing a unidirectional
(positive) relationship between work discipline and employee performance. So it
can be stated that the higher the work discipline, the higher the performance
of employees.
b. The Work Motivation variable (X2) has a
regression coefficient value of 0.323. This means, showing a unidirectional (positive)
relationship between work motivation and employee performance. So it can be
stated that the higher the work motivation, the higher the performance of
employees.
c. The Organizational Commitment variable (X3) has
a regression coefficient value of 0.158. This means, showing a unidirectional
(positive) relationship between organizational commitment and employee
performance. So it can be stated that the higher the commitment of the
organization, the higher the performance of employees.
Instrument Credential Test Results
Validity Test
The validity test is used to measure the validity or
validity of a questionnaire. A questionnaire is said to be valid if the
questions on the questionnaire can reveal something that the questionnaire will
measure. Based on the results of the validity test all sample items in this
study are 109 so it refers to the formula df = n-2 which gives the results df =
109 � 2 = 107 = 0.1584 so that the value of r is calculated > r table. It
can be concluded that all statement items in this study are valid and can be
used in research.
Reliability Test
Reliability
tests are used to obtain valid, reliable research results and are used to
measure many times to produce the same data (consistency). Reliability tests
are performed on question items that are declared valid. Based on the results
of the reliability test, it is explained that the results of the reliability
test can be shown by the value of Cronbach's Alpha. Cronbach's alpha value of
employee performance is 0.834, work discipline is 0.899, work motivation is
0.905, and organizational commitment is 0.884 or above the value of 0.06
(>0.06) so it can be concluded that the variables in this study are
reliable.
Model Qualification Test Results
Test F (Test Model Qualification/Goodness of Fit)
Test F is performed to determine whether the
regression model in this study is feasible or not to use. The results of this
test can be seen in Table 4.16 below:
Table 1
Model Qualification Test Results (Test F)
|
Model |
Some of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
663,162 |
3 |
221,054 |
61,747 |
,000b |
|
|
Residual |
375,902 |
105 |
3,580 |
||
|
|
Total |
1039,064 |
108 |
|
||
a. Dependent Variable:
Employee Performance
b. Predictors: (Constant), Organizational Commitment, Work Motivation, Work Discipline
Source:
SPSS 23 Processing Results
Based on the Anova Test table above, it can be seen
that the results of the Fcalculate test have a value of 61.747 > Ftable 2.69
and the significance value is smaller than the error rate (0.000 < 0.05) so
it can be concluded that the regression model in this study is estimated to be
worthy of further research.
Coefficient
of Determination (R2)
The Determination Coefficient Test (R2) aims to
determine how much influence Work Discipline (X1), Work Motivation (X2), and
Organizational Commitment (X3) can describe changes in the variable Employee
Performance (Y). The test results of the coefficient of determination (R2) are
attached to table 2 as follows:
Table 2
Multiple Determination Coefficient Test Results
(R2) Model Summary
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error
of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
|
1 |
,799a |
,638 |
,628 |
1,892 |
1,945 |
a.
Predictors: (Constant), Organizational
Commitment, Work Motivation, Work Discipline
b. Dependent Variable:
Employee Performance
Source: Processing Results SPSS 23
Based on the summary model in Table 2, the value of
the correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799 or 79.9% is obtained, which means that
the level of relationship between the variables Work Discipline (X1), Work
Motivation (X2), and Organizational Commitment (X3) to Employee Performance (Y)
at the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office has a strong correlation level.
Then, the value of the coefficient of determination (R-square) is 0.638 or
63.8%, which means that the factors of Work Discipline (X1), Work Motivation
(X2), and Organizational Commitment (X3) to Employee Performance (Y) at the DKI
Jakarta Provincial Education Office are 63.8%, while the remaining 36.2% is
described by other variable factors that are not included in this study.
The Pilgrims
(T)
The t-test or partial
hypothesis test aims to see whether the variables Work Discipline (X1), Work
Motivation (X2), and Organizational Commitment (X3) have an effect on the
variable Employee Performance (Y) with a significance level of 0.05. The
results of partial hypothesis testing (t-test) are attached to the following
table:
Table
Hypothesis Test Results (test t)
|
Variable |
calculate |
Sig |
Information |
|
Work
Discipline |
5,059 |
0,000 |
Positive and
Significant |
|
Work Motivation |
4,083 |
0,000 |
Positive and
Significant |
|
Organizational
Commitment |
2,225 |
0,028 |
Positive and
Significant |
Sumber:
Hasil Pengolahan
SPSS 23
Based on the table of each
independent variable in this study, namely work discipline (X1), work
motivation (X2), and organizational commitment (X3) partially have a positive
and significant effect on the performance of employees (Y) at the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office.
The calculated value of the work discipline
variable of 5.059 and the significance value of the work discipline t-test of
0.000 is smaller than the error rate of 5% (0.000 < 0.05) i.e. Ho is
rejected and Ha is accepted. It can be concluded that work discipline has a
positive and significant effect on employee performance.
The calculated value of the
work motivation variable of 4.083 and the significance value of the work
motivation t-test of 0.000 is smaller than the error rate of 5% (0.000 <
0.05) where Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It can be concluded that work
motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance.
The calculated value of the
organizational commitment variable of 2.225 and the significance value of the
organizational commitment t-test of 0.028 is smaller than the error rate of 5%
(0.043 < 0.05) i.e. Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It can be concluded
that organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect on
employee performance.
Discussion
Work Discipline on Employee Performance
Based on
the results of research in this study, it is shown that work discipline has a
positive and significant effect on the performance of employees of the DKI
Jakarta Provincial Education Office, meaning that the variable of work
discipline (X1) influences employee performance (Y). This is shown in the
t-hypothesis test, the result is that the significance value is smaller than
the error/error level used in this study 5% or equal to (0.000 < 0.05) it
can be stated that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted which means that the Work
Discipline attitude possessed by an employee can improve performance and
produce the desired output of the company.
The
regression coefficient of the Work Discipline variable (X1) of 0.444 means that
if other independent variables have a fixed value and Work Discipline increases
by 1%, then Employee Performance (Y) will increase by 0.444 It can be concluded
that work discipline has the greatest influence on the performance of employees
of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office. The attitude of work discipline
of employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office who obey
regulations, punctuality, and existing work standards in the company makes
tasks and work be completed on time to increase productivity and time
efficiency. On the contrary, if an employee does not have good work discipline
will reduce his performance because the employee is fairly unable to follow
existing regulations and has an arbitrary attitude, then the company should
give a reprimand or warning to the employee. Companies need to pay attention to
the work discipline of their employees because one of the factors to achieve
the success of a company is to have employees who have a high work discipline
attitude.
The
results of research in this study also support the results of previous research
researched by Muhammad Arief, et al (2019), Ipan Hilmawan (2020), and Reza
Nurul Ichsan, et al (2020) the results their research show that work discipline
has a positive and significant effect on employee performance.
Work Motivation for Employee Performance
Based on
the results of research in this study, it is seen that work motivation has a
positive and significant effect on the performance of employees of the DKI
Jakarta Provincial Education Office, so it can be concluded that the variable
of work motivation (X2) influences the performance of employees of the DKI
Jakarta Provincial Education Office. This can be seen in the t-test, the
results show that the significance value is smaller than the error/error level
used in this study 5% or equal to (0.000 < 0.05) it can be stated that Ho is
rejected and Ha is accepted. This means that the motivation that an employee
has, will improve employee performance due to the encouragement from within the
employee to work more vigorously and enthusiastically. In addition, the type of
motivation is divided into two, namely positive and negative, where the type of
motivation can improve employee performance.
The
regression coefficient of the Work Motivation variable (X2) of 0.323 means that
if other independent variables have a fixed value and Work Motivation increases
by 1%, then Employee Performance (Y) will increase by 0.323 it can be concluded
that work motivation influences the performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office. Work motivation variables (X2) can be factors that
affect employee performance, this is because employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office have high motivation and support or encouragement
to meet their needs such as physiological needs, security needs, social
relationship needs, self-actualization needs and recognition needs.
Employees
who have high work motivation tend to be more eager to work because of the
drive that arises in themselves to carry out activities or activities with
enthusiasm and enthusiasm to exert all abilities, knowledge, and skills to
complete a job to achieve company goals, this is what can improve their
performance. The results of the research in this study are also in line with
previous research conducted by Sari Hestini and Haryana (2020), Kepi
Kusumayanti, et al (2020), and Efrinawati, et al (2022) their research results
show that work motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee
performance.
Organizational Commitment to Employee Performance
Based on
the results of research in this study, it can be seen in testing the hypothesis
that organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect on
employee performance, so it can be concluded that the organizational commitment
variable (X3) affects the performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta
Provincial Education Office. This can be seen in the t-test, the results show
that the significance value is smaller than the error/error level used in this
study 5% or equal to (0.028 < 0.05) can be stated that Ho is rejected and Ha
is accepted. This means that employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education
Office have a high organizational commitment, a commitment that is an
employee's loyalty to his company and his organization.
The
regression coefficient of the Organizational Commitment variable (X3) of 0.158
means that if other independent variables have a fixed value and Organizational
Commitment increases by 1%, then Employee Performance (Y) will increase by
0.158 it can be concluded that organizational commitment influences the
performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office.
Organizational commitment variables can be factors that affect employee
performance.
Commitment
is an attitude of loyalty of a person with his willingness to give all his
energy and effort for the achievement of organizational goals that are being
carried out. Employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office have a
strong sense of belonging to the company where they work, have an attitude of
liking their organization, and other things that are more than just formal
membership. The results of research in this study are also in line with
previous research conducted by Agustina Massora (2019), Natalia Pangaila,
Olivia Nelwan and Victor Lengkong (2022), and Intan Maharani and Suryono Efendi
(2017) the results of their research show that organizational commitment has a
positive and significant effect on employee performance.
CONCLUSION
Based on
the results of the discussion and testing described above about "The
influence of work discipline, work motivation, and organizational commitment on
the performance of employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education
Office" the following conclusions can be drawn:
Work
discipline has a positive and significant influence on the performance of
employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office. This means that work
discipline can be used as a determining factor for employee performance. The
higher the work discipline possessed by employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial
Education Office, the more their performance will increase.
Work
motivation has a positive and significant influence on the performance of
employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Education Office. This means that work
motivation can be used as an actor determining employee performance. The higher
the work motivation possessed by employees of the DKI Jakarta Education Office,
the more their performance will increase. Organizational commitment has a
positive and significant influence on the performance of employees of the DKI
Jakarta Provincial Education Office. This means that the stronger the
organizational commitment held by employees of the DKI Jakarta Provincial
Education Office, the more it will improve its performance because of
employees.
Acknowledgment
This
article is a part of joint research and publication between the Faculty of
Economics and Business, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, and the Faculty of
Business, Economics, and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
REFERENCES
Adha, R. N., Qomariah, N., &
Hafidzi, A. H. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, Budaya Kerja
Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Penelitian
IPTEKS, 4(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.32528/ipteks.v4i1.2109
As�ad, A. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi
, Motivasi Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. YUME :
Journal of Management, 4(1), 191�
200.
https://doi.org/10.37531/yume.vxix.344
Belti, J., & Osnardi. (2020).
Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada
Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (Pdam) Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Manajemen Modal Insani
Dan Bisnis, 1(2), 109�116. Burhannudin, B., Zainul, M., & Harlie, M.
(2019). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, dan Komitmen� Organisasional� terhadap
Kinerja Karyawan:����� Studi��� pada���� Rumah Sakit���� Islam��� Banjarmasin. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen,
Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 191.
https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v8i2.425
Darmawan, A. (2022). Pengaruh
Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap
Kinerja Karyawan. Journal of Applied Managerial Accounting,����� 6(1),���� 21�32.
https://doi.org/10.30871/jama.v6i1.3960
Deny, K., Sunaryo, H., &
Wahono, B. (2017). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Disiplin Kerja Dan Lingkungan
Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling,
110(9), 1689�1699.
Ferdinand, A. (2013). Metode
Penelitian Manajemen. Universitas Diponegoro Frimayasa, A., & Lawu, S. H.
(2020). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi Dan
Human Capital Terhadap Kinerja Pada
Karyawan Pt. Frisian Flag. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan
Akuntansi, 9(1), 36� 47. https://doi.org/10.35906/je001.v9i1.485
Ghozali, Imam. (2018). Aplikasi
Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas
Diponegoro: Semarang
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2016).
Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Penerbit PT Bumi Aksara.
Hustia, A. (2020). Pengaruh
Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan
Pada Perusahaan WFO Masa Pandemi. Jurnal� Ilmu���� Manajemen,���� 10(1),�� 81.
https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v10i1.2929
Kasmir. (2016). Manajemen Sumber
Data Manusia (Teori dan Praktik), Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Lumenta, M. E., Sepang, J. L.,
& Tawas, H. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi Dan
Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Dan Penataan
Ruang Kota Manado. Jurnal Emba: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan
Akuntansi, 07(2), 291�300.
Mangkunegara, A. P. (2017).
Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Minggu, M. M., Lengkong, V. P. K.,
& Rumokoy, F. S. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Disiplin Kerja Dan
Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Di PT. Air Manado. Jurnal EMBA:
Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(2), 1071�1080.
Nurjaya, N. (2021). Pengaruh
Disiplin Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan
Pada Pt. Hazara Cipta Pesona. AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 3(1), 60�74.
Pangaila, N., Nelwan, O., &
Lengkong, V. (2022). Pengaruh komitmen organisasi, disiplin kerja dan
lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada badan kepegawaian daerah
prov.sulut Jurnal EMBA Vol . 10 No . 2 April 2022 , Ha. Jurnal EMBA, 10(2),
964�973.
Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi DKI
Jakarta Nomor 277, Tahun 2016, tentang
Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Dinas
Pendidikan
Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 46,
Tahun 2011, tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negri Sipil.
Putri, M. K., & Maralis, R.
(2019). Analisis Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Di Perpustakaan Sekolah Tinggi
Ilmu Ekonomi Indragiri (Stie-I) Rengat Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. Jurnal
Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 70�85. https://doi.org/10.34006/jmbi.v8i1.55
Priansa, D.J. (2016). Perencanaan dan
Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.
CV. Alfabeta.
Rahayu, E. P. (2021). Pengaruh motivasi kerja,
disiplin kerja dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan (studi kasus pada
PT. Pinus Merah Abadi Surabaya). Jurnal Ilmu Dan RISET Manajemen, Vol 10(3),
1�16.
Robbins, P. Stephen & Colter, Mary. (2016),
Human Resources Management, Edisi 16, Jilid 1. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Robbins, S.P., Timothy A. Judge. (2016).
Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 16. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Saleh, F., Mashita, J., & Anggresta, V.
(2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja
Karyawan PT. Andalan Finance Depok. JABE (Journal of Applied Business and
Economics), 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v6i1.5166
Sari Hestini, & Haryani. (2020). Pengaruh
Disiplin Kerja, Motivasi Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai
Kantor Kecamatan Semarang Barat. Dharma Ekonomi, 37(51), 50.
Shihab, M. R., Prahiawan, W., Maria, V., Raya,
J., Km, J., & Banten, K. S. (2022). 3) 1,2,3. 3(3), 5479�5492
Simamora, H., Hamid, D., & Prasetya, A.
(2016). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik dan Non Fisik Terhadap Motivasi Kerja
Karyawan (Studi Pada Karyawan Hotel Atria & Konferensi Malang). Jurnal
Administrasi Bisnis S1 Universitas Brawijaya, 31(1), 158�166.
Sinambela. L. P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya
Manusia: Membangun Tim Kerja yang Solid untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja, Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara
Sugiyono (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfa-beta. Susanto, N. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi
Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, dan Disiplin Kerja
Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Divisi Penjualan
PT Rembaka. Agora, 7(1), 6�12.
Sutrisno, E. (2016), Manajemen Sumber Daya
Manusia, (Cetakan ke 8), Jakarta : Prenada Media Group
Tugiyono, J. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja
terhadap Kinerja Karyawan LPK Pramidia Bandung. Jurnal TEDC, 13(3), 267�275.
|
Copyright holder: Mutiara Azzahra, Herry Krisnandi, Kumba
Digdowiseiso (2024) |
|
First publication right: |
|
This article is licensed under: |