Implementation of Good Governance in the Sidoarjo Regency Regional Library
Journal of Social Science, Vol. 04, No. 05, Septemberr 2023 1236
accountability. So then the aim of
good governance
is to control the relationships and decisions
made. The implementation of
good governance
is a good breakthrough where the public becomes
the master, while the organization is the service. In this way, it can increase satisfaction from the
community as the party served, resulting in an increase in public satisfaction which is the key to
the running of an organization (Aguilera & Cuervo‐Cazurra, 2009).
Public services are carried out in a creative situation, where citizens, the wider community
and public officials can work together to consider the determination and implementation of public
bureaucracy, which is oriented towards administrative activities and community service activities.
To improve public services, “The New Public Service (NPS) " can provide a change in the
bureaucratic conditions of government services (Sukmadilaga, Pratama, & Mulyani, 2015).
Implementing a public service is quite challenging and requires courage for government officials
in administering public services, because they sacrifice time and energy to influence all applicable
systems. So the alternative offered is that the government must listen to the public's voice in
participating in governance management. According to the NPS paradigm, running government
administration is not the same as a business organization. Public administration must be driven
as a democratic organizational structure. The mission of public organizations is not just to satisfy
service users but also to provide goods and services to fulfill public rights and obligations.
The paradigm shift in thinking from the state as the main source of service so that society
or the public inevitably has to obey state services, then changed with the arrival of good
governance
where the central axis of service is the public as the master while the state is present
as the servant. Furthermore, in this way the public can control its implementation. In this case,
the state acts as a guide and bridge between the public and existing institutions, thereby creating
two directions aimed at monitoring, protecting and encouraging the implementation of
good
governance
(Brynard, 2009)
.
In public administration, what is meant by public interest and how
public interest is realized does not only depend on state institutions. Public interests must be
formulated and implemented by all relevant elements, including the state, business and civil
society. This kind of view is what makes the NPS paradigm also known as the governance
paradigm . Governance theory holds that the state or government in this global era is no longer
believed to be the only institution or actor capable of efficiently, economically and fairly providing
various forms of public services so that the governance paradigm places importance on
partnerships and networking between many stakeholders . in the administration of public affairs.
In its development, regional libraries are not only a complement to regional institutions,
but must also have a real role in their main functions (Pemkab Sidoarjo, 2016). Thus, a strategic
work step is needed so that it can provide optimal service and can be the main goal, but there
must be evaluation and supervision that can be accounted for. So it is necessary to take policy
steps, both in the form of evaluation, which are focused on administration or implementation of
policies and programs. What must be answered is the aim of obtaining benefits from the programs
that will be implemented in the Sidoarjo Regency regional library, whether the program is running
smoothly. According to plan or deviate from the original goal. Then it can become a reference
that will be utilized more effectively in the future. Evaluation carried out with emphasis on the
items that were the original goal, will help us to explain whether a program is running efficiently
and cleanly. Likewise, the impact on social effects will be obtained (Handayani & Nur, 2019).
The form of policy evaluation is linked to the systematics and objectives of the evaluation.
The aim is to determine the social impact of policies and the level of achievement of policy
objectives. So the evaluation is carried out by comparing several programs, both to assess their
social benefits and which program is most successful in achieving targets. This form of evaluation
is currently receiving increasing attention. Systematic policy evaluation is a difficult and complex