INDEPENDENCE, WORK ETHIC, SPIRITUALITY, AND PRODUCTIVITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEVERAL ASIAN COUNTRIES

 

Mustofa*, Suyanto, Bambang Suprayitno, Nita Kusumawardani

Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia�

Email:� mustofa@uny.ac.id*

 

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Received: June 28, 2022

Revision: July 12, 2022

Received: July 22, 2022

This study compares the values ​​of independence, work ethic, spirituality, and productivity in several Asian countries. The other purpose of this study is to determine the effect of independence, work ethic, and spirituality on productivity. This study uses World Value Survey (WVS) data with the criteria of respondents who answered the WVS wave 7 questionnaires from Asian countries with a sample size of 19,795. The quantitative research method uses descriptive analysis techniques and probit regression analysis. The descriptive analysis technique uses crosstab, while the probit regression analysis technique is used to determine the effect of independence, work ethic, and spirituality on productivity in several Asian countries. Analysis crosstab shows that Tajikistan, Iran, Taiwan, Pakistan, and the Philippines have a high proportion of unemployed. Kyrgyzstan, Jordan, China, Bangladesh, and Vietnam have a higher tendency for freedom of choice (independence) in their respective country groups. Kyrgyzstan, Jordan, China, Pakistan, and Myanmar have higher work ethic tendencies. Russia, China, Japan, and Vietnam have minor religious inclinations. Probit regression results prove that independence, work ethic, and spirituality significantly affect the dependent variable (productivity). Independence and work ethic have a positive influence, while spirituality has a negative influence. In contrast, all members of the West Asian group all countries have important religious inclinations.

Keywords:

Independence; work ethic; spirituality; productivity

 

 


INTRODUCTION


The influence of cultural values ​​, including spirituality, on development, is always interesting to study. Weber (1930), in his book "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism," argues that the Christian (Protestant) ethic inherent in European society encourages European progress and modernity. Jaffee (1998), in the book "Levels of Socio-economic Development Theory," asserts that the success of development depends on characters or traits such as achievement motivation and the work ethic of every individual in society as development actors.

Culture is defined as customs, beliefs, and values ​​held by ethnic, religious, and social groups that tend to remain unchanged from generation to generation (Guiso, Sapienza, & Zingales, 2003). The values ​​of independence, work ethic, and spirituality of each country are reflected in the behavior of human resources. Human resources have an essential role in the process of economic development. Together with infrastructure and governance, labor resources are a vital factor that can encourage and accelerate the ups and downs of an economy's competitiveness (APO, 2015; OECD, 2015; World Bank, 2010).

Several empirical studies, such as U��k and Vokorokosov� (2007) and Auzina-Emsina (2014), show a reasonably strong correlation between the competitiveness of labor resources and the competitiveness of the economy. The higher the competitiveness of labor resources in a country, the higher the competitiveness of that country's economy, or vice versa.

One indicator of a country's development performance is reflected in the productivity of its citizens. Productivity can be a measure of the comparison of the quality and quantity of a workforce in a unit of time to achieve work results or performance. Productivity contains philosophical meanings, definitions, and operational technicalities (Simanjuntak, 1998).

The criteria for human resources that support the development results are human resources with the character of independence. Independent character encourages and spurs a person to solve his own life and life problems so that he is motivated to take the initiative, be creative, innovate, be proactive and work hard. Independence is defined as attitudes and behaviors that are not easy to depend on others to complete tasks (Zuchdi, 2012). Independence is also defined as the ability to make decisions and manage one's life without being overly dependent on others. Independence cannot be completed at one stage of life but will continue to develop within the individual (Susetyo, 2006).

Cultural values ​​other than independence that affect development performance are the work ethic of its citizens. Work ethic is a work spirit characteristic of a person or group of people who work, which is based on a believed work ethic or perspective and is realized through factual determination and behavior in the world of work (Ginting, 2016). The work ethic contains a set of positive work behaviors rooted in solid cooperation and fundamental beliefs, accompanied by a total commitment to an integral work paradigm (Sinamo, 2011). A good work ethic will show character and attitude, and have confidence in a job by working and acting optimally (Mathis & Jackson, 2006). The development and underdevelopment of an ethnic or nation is a matter of having or not having a work ethic following development (Mubyarto, 1993). The higher the work ethic, manifested in their willingness to work hard and live frugally and simply, the more likely they will succeed in development efforts.

Iannaccone (1998) introduced a new field of study or research, namely the economics of religion. Spirituality is similar or, in a way, related to specific emotions or behaviors, and attitudes of an individual (Schreurs, 2002). Being spiritual means being open, giving, and loving. Schraeder (2002) explains spirituality as a personal relationship to a transcendent figure. Spirituality can also be about feelings of purpose, meaning, and feelings of connection with others (Fernando & Jackson, 2006). These studies use economic tools and methods to study religion as the dependent variable or to study religion as an independent variable on the outcome of other socioeconomic variables. The influence of religion, both in terms of religiosity and spirituality, on economic development is an exciting object of study (Iyer, 2016). Firmansyah and Pratiwi (2019) also found that the involvement of religious ideas and spirituality can contribute to the development process.

The originality of this research is that this research compares the values ​​of independence, work ethic, spirituality, and productivity of several other Asian countries, especially those whose citizens are religious or non-religious (atheists). The influence of socio-cultural values ​​on development is sometimes difficult to describe through a statistical approach. Cultural values ​​such as independence, work ethic, and spirituality tend to be closer to qualitative data (non-numeric). Previous research used qualitative method, Aquino, Multifiah, & Manzilati (2020) examine the role of spiritual leadership and work ethic in increasing productivity. The novelty of this research is the used of quantitative methods to answer two research questions. The first research question is how do the values ​​of independence, work ethic, spirituality, and productivity compare in several Asian countries. The second research question is what are the effects of independence, work ethic, and spirituality on productivity.

 

METHOD

The research data source uses the results of the World Value Survey (WVS) wave 7. This survey contains a list of questions (questionnaires) about values ​​for various countries, including Asian countries. Asian countries in WVS wave 7 consist of Central Asia, West Asia, East Asia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. Central Asian countries include Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. West Asia consists of Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Turkey, and Jordan. East Asia consists of China, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. South Asia consists of Bangladesh and Pakistan. Southeast Asia consists of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Myanmar. �The reason for using samples from Asian countries is the diversity of the majority religions adopted by citizens. There are countries that are predominantly Muslim, such as Indonesia and Malaysia. The majority of the population is Catholic, like the Philippines. The majority of the population is Buddhist, like Thailand and Myanmar. The majority of the population is not religious, such as China, Hong Kong, and South Korea.

The research model uses a binary productivity variable with a value of one (1) if the respondent is working and zero (0) if the respondent is not. The variables in this study include independence, work ethic, spirituality, and productivity. The Independent Character Variable was obtained from the answers to the Q48 WVS questionnaire. The work ethic variable was obtained from the answers to the Q110 questionnaire. The spirituality variable in this study was obtained from the answers to the WVS Q6 questionnaire. The productivity variable was obtained from the answers to the WVS Q279 questionnaire.

 

The analytical method used in this study is a comparative descriptive technique to compare the values ​​of independence, work ethic, spirituality, and productivity based on groups of Asian countries. The probit regression method uses the analysis technique to analyze the effect of independence, work ethic, and spirituality on productivity. 


 

Table 1

Group of Asian Countries in WVS wave 7

Group of Asian Countries

Number of samples

Percentage

of Central Asia

Russia

992

5.01

Kyrgyzstan

820

4.14

Tajikistan

732

3.70

West Asia

Iran

786

3.97

Iraq

579

2.92

Lebanon

724

3.66

Turkey

1,406

7.10

Jordan

472

2.38

East Asia

China

1,687

8.52

Hong Kong SAR

1,318

6.66

Taiwan ROC

720

3.64

Japan

482

2.43

South Korea

726

3.67

South Asia

Bangladesh

510

2.58

Pakistan

992

5.01

Southeast Asia

Indonesia

2,234

11.29

Malaysia

985

4.98

Philippines

777

3.93

Vietnam

937

4.73

Thailand

1,031

5.21

Myanmar

885

4.47

Total

19,795

100.00

Data source: WVS Wave 7

 


Table 1 shows the group of Asian countries in WVS wave 7 and the number of samples that meet the criteria. The criteria used as samples are individuals aged 18-59 years who work full time, work part-time, have their own business, and do not work. The individual thoroughly answered the WVS wave 7 questionnaires for the variables of productivity, independence, work ethic, and spirituality. After cleaning the data from 20 countries in Asia, the number of samples in this study was 19,795.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A.  Productivy

Productivity variables were obtained from the answers to the Q279 WVS questionnaire. �Do you work?� Answer options� Yes, work and get paid or No, not paid�. The form of the productivity variable in this study is a discrete variable, namely working (worth 1) or not working (worth 0). Table 2 shows the group of Asian countries that have the highest proportion of unemployed, including Tajikistan for the Central Asia group, Iran for the West Asia group, Taiwan for the East Asia group, Pakistan for the South Asian group, and the Philippines for the Southeast Asian group.


 

Table 2

Productivity Comparison between Asian Countries

Working Status

Skill Labor

Group of Asian Countries

Not Working (%)

Working

(%)

No

(%)

Yes

(%)

Central Asia

Russia

6.35

93.65

22.98

77.02

Kyrgyzstan

0, 00

100.00

50.12

49.88

Tajikistan

37.84

62.16

41.53

58.47

West Asia

Iran

29.26

70.74

34.99

65.01

Iraq

18.83

81.17

38.34

61, 66

Lebanon

5.11

94.89

16.16

83.84

Turkey

10.17

89.83

22.33

77.67

Jordan

16.31

83.69

28.39

71.61

East Asia

China

5.75

94.25

31,54

68.46

Hong Kong SAR

3.19

96.81

8.35

91.65

Taiwan ROC

6.39

93.61

23.89

76.11

Japan

1.45

98.55

17.01

82.99

South Korea

2,48

97.52

7.02

92.98

South Asia

Bangladesh

7.84

92.16

60.39

39.61

Pakistan

8.57

91.43

45.67

54.33

Southeast Asia

Indonesia

3.58

96.42

49, 96

50.04

Malaysia

4.47

95.53

12.08

87.92

Philippines

23.81

76.19

53.54

46.46

Vietnam

0.85

99.15

33.19

66.81

Thailand

4.46

95.54

59.84

40.16

Myanmar

7.01

92.99

60.00

40.00

Total

8.57

91.43

34.47

65.53

Data source: WVS Wave 7

 


In which group does your mother/father/brother's job belong? The quality of the workforce is obtained from the answers to the WVS Q281 questionnaire. Table 2 describes labor productivity of working status and the quality of the workforce (including skilled labor or unskilled labor). Workers with skills include those who work as professional and technical, higher administrative, clerical, sales, service, and skilled workers. Those who work with more minor skill needs include semi-skilled workers, unskilled workers, farm workers, farm owners, farm managers, and other jobs. The group of Asian countries that have the highest proportion of unskilled labor includes Kyrgyzstan, Iraq, China, Bangladesh, and Myanmar.

B.  Independence

The independence variable was obtained from the answers to the WVS Q48 questionnaire. Some people say they have the freedom to choose and control their lives, while others feel that what they do does not produce anything (no effect) that matters to them. Please use a scale where 1 means no choice and 10 means you have an extensive choice in determining how much freedom you have to choose and control your life. The responses in the WVS were then transformed from being very independent (score 1), i.e., having no choice at all or not being independent, to being very independent (score 10), i.e., having an extensive choice in determining and controlling life.


 

Table 3

Comparison of Independence among Asian Countries

Group

(in percent)

Asian Countries

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Central Asia

Russia

8.27

5.95

7.06

11.39

9.98

15.93

7.36

8.97

6.35

18.75

Kyrgyzstan

15.49

1.83

2.07

2.80

2.80

8.54

1.34

1.83

2.44

60.85

Tajikistan

13.93

8.74

9.97

8.61

10.93

14.34

7.65

11.07

10.66

4.10

West Asia

Iran

10.43

1.53

5.47

4.96

4.45

17.18

3.69

4.20

7, 00

41.09

Iraq

27.12

15.03

12.44

9.33

6.74

7.77

3.45

3.11

3.97

11.05

Lebanon

1.93

4.97

9.53

9.39

7, 73

22.10

18.23

13.40

10.08

2.62

Turkey

9.25

2.92

8.11

12.94

13.44

15.43

11.02

9.25

5.19

12.45

Jordan

12, 71

2.12

3.18

1.69

2.97

6.57

3.18

5.08

6.78

55.72

East Asia

China

3.85

4.15

5.28

5.63

6.05

9.84

7,65

13.87

15.23

28.45

Hong Kong SAR

2.88

3.79

9.94

14.11

12.52

14.57

11.99

14.11

8.19

7.89

Taiwan ROC

2.92

1,81

7.78

10.00

10.42

20.56

8.19

14.17

8.33

15.83

Japan

4.15

1.04

8.92

11.83

13.28

17.22

14.11

17, 43

6.22

5.81

South Korea

1.10

1.65

11.85

22.87

19.01

13.91

14.46

9.64

4.41

1.10

South Asia

Bangladesh

1.57

3.92

4.12

4.90

4.71

15.10

8.04

6.27

11.96

39.41

Pakistan

11.39

3.63

4.33

4.74

6.35

10.08

5.24

5.14

5,75

43.35

Southeast Asia

Indonesia

8.15

3.58

5.06

5.77

4.70

12.85

7.52

7.79

11.50

33.08

Malaysia

4.47

4.26

7.92

9, 75

12.79

15.74

9.64

11.57

11.27

12.59

Philippines

5.53

3.73

5.28

4.76

5.66

18.02

6.44

8.11

10.17

32.30

Vietnam

5.34

3.09

4.06

3.84

6.30

15.47

5.12

8.32

10.57

37.89

Thailand

6.30

3.49

9.60

9.89

11.64

19.69

7.47

8.05

5.43

18.43

Myanmar

11.30

2.71

5.42

3.50

3.95

12.32

2.49

5.65

5.99

46.67

Total

7.63

3.89

6.87

8.23

​​8.36

14.28

7.90

9.13

8.47

25.24

Independence has a scale of 1-10. 1 = not independent (no choice at all), 10 = very independent (have extensive choices in determining and controlling life).

Data source: WVS Wave 7


Table 3 shows that the level of independence of each respondent from various Asian countries is relatively high. The group of Central Asian countries shows that Kyrgyzstan has greater freedom of choice than Russia and Tajikistan. The group of West Asian countries shows that Jordan tends to have more freedom of choice than other countries. The group of East Asian countries shows that China tends to have more freedom of choice than other countries. The group of South Asian countries shows that Bangladesh has greater freedom of choice than Pakistan. The group of Southeast Asian countries shows that Vietnam tends to have greater freedom of choice than other countries.�

C.  Work Ethic

The work ethic variable was obtained from the answers to the Q110 questionnaire. In the long run, hard work usually leads to a better life or working hard does not always lead to success � it is more than luck and connections. The responses in the WVS were transformed on a ten-point scale ranging from not optimistic �Working hard does not always lead to success � it depends more on luck and connections.� (score 1-5) to an optimistic work ethic �usually hard work leads to a better life" (score 6-10). The work ethic of each respondent from various countries is relatively high. Below are the answers from respondents regarding work ethic.

 

Table 4

Comparison of work ethic among Asian countries

group

(in percent)

Asian countries

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Central Asia

Russia

18.75

6.35

8.97

7.36

15.93

9.98

11,39

7.06

5.95

8.27

Kyrgyzstan

60.85

2.44

1.83

1.34

8.54

2.80

2.80

2.07

1.83

15.49

Tajikistan

4.10

10.66

11 .07

7.65

13.34

10.93

8.61

9.97

8.74

13.93

West Asia

Iran

41.09

7.00

4.20

3.69

17.18

4.45

4.96

5.47

1.53

10.43

Iraq

11.05

3.97

3.11

3.45

7.77

6.74

9.33

12.44

15.03

27.12

Lebanon

2.62

10.08

13.40

18.23

22.10

7.73

9.39

9.53

4.97

1.93

Turkey

12.45

5.19

9.25

11.02

15.43

13.44

12.94

8.11

2.12

9.25

Jordan

55.72

6.78

5.08

3.18

6.57

2.97

1.69

3.18

2.12

12.71

East Asia

China

28.45

15.23

13.87

7.65

9.84

6, 05

5.63

5.28

4.15

3.85

Hong Kong SAR

7.89

8.19

14.11

11.99

14.57

12.52

14.11

9.94

3.79

2.88

Taiwan ROC

15, 83

8.33

14.17

8.19

20.56

10.42

10.00

7.78

1.81

2.92

Japan

5.81

6.22

17.43

14.11

17.22

13.28

11.83

8.92

1.04

4.15

South Korea

1.10

4.41

9.64

14.46

13.91

19.01

22.87

11.85

1.65

1.10

South Asia

Bangladesh

39.41

11.96

6.27

8.04

15.10

4.71

4.90

4.12

3.92

1.57

Pakistan

43.35

5.75

5.14

5.24

10.08

6.35

4.74

4.33

3,63

11.39

Southeast Asia

Indonesia

33.08

11.50

7.79

7.52

12.85

4.70

5.77

5.06

3.58

8.15

Malaysia

12.59

11.27

11.57

9, 64

15.74

12.79

9.75

7.92

4.26

4.47

Philippines

32.30

10.17

8.11

6.44

18.02

5.66

4.76

5.28

3.73

5.53

Vietnam

37.89

10.57

8.32

5.12

15.47

6.30

3.84

4.06

3.09

5.34

Thailand

18.43

5.43

8.05

7.47

19.69

11.64

9.89

9.60

3.49

6.30

Myanmar

46.67

5.99

5.65

2.49

12.32

3.95

3.50

5.42

2.71

11.30

Total

work ethic has a scale of 1 = luck and connection, 10 = optimistic better

Data source: WVS Wave 7


Table 4 shows a comparison of work ethics in Asian countries. The group of Central Asian countries shows that Kyrgyzstan has a higher work ethic than other countries. The group of West Asian countries shows Jordan has a greater work ethic tendency than other countries. The group of East Asian countries shows that China has a greater work ethic tendency than other countries. The group of South Asian countries shows that Pakistan has a greater work ethic tendency than Bangladesh. The group of Southeast Asian countries shows that Myanmar tends to have greater freedom of choice than other countries.�

D.  Spirituality

Standard survey measures used to monitor religious behavior or spirituality include frequency of attendance at worship services, involvement in worship or meditation, membership in churches and religious groups and organizations, and religious identity. The spirituality variable in this study was obtained from the answers to the WVS Q6 questionnaire. For each of the following, how important is religion in your life? Would you say: (1) Very important, (2) Somewhat important, (3) Not very important, (4) Not at all important. The responses in the WVS were transformed into a four-point scale ranging from "not at all important" (score 1) to "significant" (score 4). Most respondents (52.46%) think religion is essential to their lives. If traced to each country, there will be variations in the answers, as in table 5.

Table 5

Comparison of Spirituality among Asian countries

Countries Groups of Asian Countries

 

Religion

Majority

Importance of Religion in life

Very Very Not Important

Not Very Important

Somewhat Important

Very Important

Central Asia

Russia

Christian (72.9%)

16.83%

33.67%

32.46%

17.04%

Tajikistan

Islam

(96.4%)

1.78%

6.69%

27.46%

64.07%

Kyrgyzstan

Islam

(89.4%)

4.15%

11.22%

30.49%

54.15%

West Asia

Iran

Islam

(99.5%)

4.96%

3.94%

23.66%

67.43%

Iraq

Islam

(99.1%)

1.21%

3.11%

12.44%

83.25%

Lebanese

Islamic (61.2%)

2.90%

7.32%

28.18%

61.60%

Turkish

Islam

(98%)

1.14%

10.67%

30.73%

57.47%

Jordanian

Islam

(97.1%)

0.00%

0.85%

4.03%

95.13%

East Asian

China

No religion (51.8% )

42.21%

45.05%

9.72%

3.02%

Hong Kong SAR

No religion (54.7%)

24.13%

44.76%

21.24%

9.86%

Taiwan

Local religion (43.8 %)

10.00%

42.78%

35.00%

12.22%

Japan

No religion (60%)

59.13%

33.40%

4.77%

2.70%

South Korea

No religion (46.6% )

17.49%

49.04%

23.14%

10, 33%

South Asia

Bangladesh

Islamic (90.8%)

0.20%

0.00%

4.31%

95.49%

Pakistani

Islam

(96.5%)

0.81%

1.61%

6.65%

90, 93%

Southeast Asia

Indonesia

Islamic

(87%)

0.09%

0.00%

1.57%

98.34%

Malaysia

Islamic (66.1%)

1.32%

7.41%

18.38%

72.89%

Filipino

Catholic (92.4%)

0.26%

2.70%

9.65%

87.39%

Vietnam

Local religion (45%)

18.36%

41.20%

29.03%

11.42%

Thai

Buddhist

(92.6%)

2.23%

14.06%

43.65%

40.06%

Myanmar

Buddhist (79.8%)

0.45%

1.13%

16.27%

82.15%

Total 

10.29%

17.97%

19.29%

52.46%

Source of data: WVS Wave 7 and PEW Research Center


Table 5 shows that based on respondents' answers, it can be seen that if a country where the majority of the population is not religious, there is a tendency that religion is not so important. This condition is different from countries where the population is predominantly religious. The Central Asian group of Russian states has less important religious leanings. The West Asian group of all countries has important religious leanings. The East Asian groups of China and Japan have less important religious leanings. In the Southeast Asian countries, Vietnam has less important religious leanings.

E.   Regression Results and Marginal Effect

There is still limited research that studies the influence of socio-cultural values ​​on development through a statistical approach. Cultural values ​​such as independence, work ethic, spirituality, and productivity tend to be closer to qualitative (non-numeric) data. Research questions about how independence, work ethic, and spirituality influence productivity can be answered using probit regression analysis techniques. The results of the probit regression can be seen in table 6.

Table 6

Probit regression results

Variable

Coefficient

Standard Error

Probability

Constant

1.507474

0.062382

0.000

Independence

0.029094

0.005600

0.000

Work ethic

0.022802

0.004317

0.000

Spirituality

-0.150895

0.013316

0.000

Log-likelihood

-5697.28

LR Chi2

182.45

Prob > Chi2

0.0000

Pseudo R2

0.0158

N

19,795

Source: WVS wave 7 data processed by researchers.

 


The estimation results in table 6 show that the 3 independent variables used in this study (independence, work ethic, and spirituality) significantly influence the dependent variable (productivity). The influence of independence, work ethic, and spirituality simultaneously can be known through Prob > x2 = 0.00000, meaning the significance value is less than the 5% significance level. It can be concluded that simultaneously the variables of independence, work ethic, and spirituality affect productivity.

Probit regression results are not precise enough to analyze the effect of independence, work ethic, and spirituality on productivity. The stages after performing probit regression are analyzing the marginal effect value.

Table 7

Marginal Effect Results

Variable

Coefficient

Independence

0.004421

Work ethic

0.003464

Spirituality

-0.022929

Data source: WVS Wave 7

 

Table 7 shows the results of the sign (direction of influence) that are consistent with table 6. Marginal effect values ​​are obtained by probability coefficient values of 0.004421 and have a positive direction. Partially, the higher the independence, the higher the probability of productivity. These results align with Cordery, Morrison, Wright, and Wall's (2010) research, which found that independent employees will increase productivity. The marginal value effect of work ethic obtained a probability coefficient value of 0.0034649 and has a positive direction. Partially, the higher the work ethic, the higher the probability of productivity. The marginal value effect of spirituality is obtained by the probability coefficient value of -0.022929or has a negative direction. Partially, the higher the spirituality, the lower the probability of productivity. These findings are in line with the research results of (Eka Dirgantara Aquino, Multifiah, & Manzilati, 2020; Bataineh, 2020; Faregh, Jahanian, & Salimi, 2021; Mi�on, 2017; Moon, Youn, Hur, & Kim, 2020), which proves that values ​​such as independence, work ethic, and spirituality have an essential role in increasing labor productivity. Different findings from the research of (Prihono, Budiartha, & Astika, 2016) and (Noh & Yoo, 2016) state that spirituality in the workplace has a positive and significant impact on work productivity.

 

CONCLUSION

Quantitative indicators of productivity from the group of Asian countries that have the highest proportion of unemployed include Tajikistan for the Central Asia group, Iran for the West Asia group, Taiwan for the East Asia group, Pakistan for the South Asia group, and the Philippines for the Southeast Asia group. The qualitative productivity indicators for groups of Asian countries with the highest proportion of unskilled labor include Kyrgyzstan, Iraq, China, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. Kyrgyzstan, Jordan, China, Bangladesh, and Vietnam in each group of countries tend to have freedom of choice (independence) is more significant than other countries. Kyrgyzstan, Jordan, China, Pakistan, and Myanmar have higher work ethic tendencies than other countries in the group. Russia, China, Japan, and Vietnam have minor religious inclinations.

Probit regression results prove that independence, work ethic, and spirituality significantly affect the dependent variable (productivity). Independence and work ethic have a positive influence, while spirituality has a negative influence. In contrast, all members of the West Asian group all countries have important religious inclinations. The limitation of the results of this study is that the marginal effect value is still small so that other relevant variables are needed to produce a large marginal effect value.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

APO. (2015). Asian Productivity Organization Productivity Data Book.

 

Aquino, E D, Multifiah, M., & Manzilati, A. (2020). the Role of Spiritual Leadership and Work Ethic in Increasing Productivity. Journal of Indonesian Applied �, 8(1). Retrieved from https://www.jiae.ub.ac.id/index.php/jiae/article/view/400 Google Scholar

 

Aquino, Eka Dirgantara, Multifiah, M., & Manzilati, A. (2020). The Role Of Spiritual Leadership And Work Ethic In Increasing ProductivitY. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 8(1), 1�7. Google Scholar

 

Auzina-Emsina, A. (2014). Labour Productivity, Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness in Post-crisis Period. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 317�321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.195 Scopus

 

Bataineh, M. T. (2020). the Effect of Work Ethics on Job Performance in International Smes in Al-Hassan Industrial Estate. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(5), 154�158. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.10364 Google Scholar

 

Cordery, J. L., Morrison, D., Wright, B. M., & Wall, T. D. (2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2�3), 240�258. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.657 Google Scholar

 

Faregh, S., Jahanian, R., & Salimi, M. (2021). Predicting Employee Productivity based on Work Ethics and Organizational Learning. International Journal of Ethics & Society, 2(4), 48�56. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijethics.2.4.48. Google Scholar

 

Fernando, M., & Jackson, B. (2006). The influence of religion-based workplace spirituality on business leaders� decision-making: An inter-faith study. Journal of Management & Organization, 12(1), 23�39. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2006.12.1.23. Google Scholar

 

Firmansyah, A., & Pratiwi, T. S. (2019). Agama dan Pembangunan: Beragam Pandangan dalam Melihat Keberkaitan Agama terhadap Proses Pembangunan dan Modernisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 15(1), 1�12. https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v15i1.2966.1-12. Google Scholar

 

Ginting, D. (2016). Etos Kerja-Panduan Menjadi Karyawan Cerdas. Elex Media Komputindo. Google Scholar

 

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People�s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 225�282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00202-7. Google Scholar

 

Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3). Google Scholar

 

Iyer, S. (2016). The New Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 395�441. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.54.2.395. Google Scholar

 

Jaffee, D. (1998). Levels of Socio-economic Development Theory. Praeger. Google Scholar

 

Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Google Scholar

 

Mi�on, C. G. (2017). Workplace spirituality, work ethics, and organizational justice as related to job performance among state university educators. Journal of Teaching and Education, 7(1), 407�418. Google Scholar

 

Moon, T.-W., Youn, N., Hur, W.-M., & Kim, K.-M. (2020). Does employees� spirituality enhance job performance? The mediating roles of intrinsic motivation and job crafting. Current Psychology, 39(5), 1618�1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9864-0 Google Scholar

 

Mubyarto, D. (1993). Etos Kerja dan Kohesi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media. Google Scholar

 

Noh, G. M., & Yoo, M. S. (2016). Effects of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Nursing Performance. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 22(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2016.22.3.251. Google Scholar

 

OECD. (2015). The Future of Productivity. Paris: OECD.

 

Prihono, Budiartha, I. K., & Astika, I. B. P. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi, Budaya Organisasi dan Spiritualitas pada Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara di Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 5(7), 2063�2090. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view/14472. Google Scholar

 

Schraeder, M. (2002). A simplified approach to strategic planning: Practical considerations and an illustrated example. Business Process Management Journal. Google Scholar

 

Schreurs, A. (2002). Psychotherapy and Spirituality: Integrating the Spiritual Dimension into Therapeutic Practice (Jessica Ki). London. Google Scholar

 

Simanjuntak, P. J. (1998). Pengantar Ekonomi Sumber Daya Manusia LPFE. Jakarta. Google Scholar

 

Sinamo, J. (2011). 8 Etos Kerja Profesional. Bandung: Institut Dharma Mahardika. Google Scholar

 

Susetyo, B. (2006). Partisipasi Kaum Awam dalam Pembangunan Menuju Kemandirian Ekonomi. Malang: Averoes. Google Scholar

 

U��k, M., & Vokorokosov�, R. (2007). Labour productivity as a factor of competitiveness�a comparative study. N�rodnohospod�řsky Obzor, 3, 58�68. Google Scholar

 

Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin. Google Scholar

 

World Bank. (2010). Stepping Up Skills, For More Jobs and Higher Productivity. Washington DC: World Bank. Google Scholar

 

Zuchdi, D. (2012). Pendidikan karakter konsep dasar dan implementasi di perguruan tinggi [Character education: Basic concepts and implementation in higher education]. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: UNY Press. Google Scholar

 



 

Copyright holder:

Mustofa, Suyanto, Bambang Suprayitno, Nita Kusumawardani (2022)

 

First publication right:

Journal of Social Science

 

This article is licensed under:

WhatsApp Image 2021-06-26 at 17