Ramasoyan, Pascalina Van Sweet Sesa,
Kurniawan Patma, Rudiawie Larasati
Cenderawasih University, Indonesia
Email: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Received
� 23 Juny 2021 Revision 1 July 2021 Approved 10 July 2021 |
Regional device
organization (OPD) of Pegunungan Bintang Regency. The internal control system has a significant effect on the
accountability of the performance of government
agencies in the Purpose Organization in this study to know and analyze
the influence of human resource competence, the influence of internal control systems influence the
quality of financial statements, the implementation of government accounting
standards on government performance accountability,and �silmultan to the
accountability of government agencies performance. ��The population in this study is employees of the Regional Device Organization
(OPD) Of Pegunungan Bintang District who routinely
carry out inspection tasks and have a minimum educational background diploma
3 (D3) Accounting, have attended
JFA training (Auditor Functional Department) �and have a minimum work experience of
1 Year. The analysis techniques used are multiple regression analysis
techniques to process and discuss the data that has been obtained and test
the proposed hypothesis. The results of the analysis are known that human
resources competency variables� have a significant influence on the accountability of the performance
of government agencies Regional Devices (OPD) Gunung
Bintang District,the quality of financial statements have a
significant effect on the accountability of the performance of government
agencies in the Regional Device Organization (OPD) Gunung
Bintang District. |
|
Keywords: hr competencies internal control system quality of financial statements implementation of government accounting standards government agency performance accountability |
INTRODUCTION
Accountability
is believed to be able to change the condition of government that can not provide public services properly towards a
democratic governance order. The implementation of an accountable government
will have the support of the public. There is public trust in what is organized,
planned, and implemented by public-oriented programs. On the part of the
organizers, accountability reflects the government's commitment to serving the
public
(Riantiarno & Azlina, 2011).
Accountability
of the performance of government agencies is as an obligation of individuals or
rulers entrusted to manage public resources and concerned with them in order to
be able to answer matters related to accountability as an instrument for control
activities, especially in the achievement of work in public services.
Performance accountability is influenced by many things, including the
application of public accounting, the quality of laws and regulations and
compliance with regulations the
quality of the financial.
The
Government of Pegunungan Bintang Regency is a newly
developed regency in Papua Province centered in Oksibil,
Gunung Bintang Regency is a regency of Jayawijaya Regency. At the beginning of the expansion of Pegunungan Bintang Regency for the first 3 years there has
been no financial reporting submitted by Pegunungan
Bintang Regency to the Audit Board of Finance (BPK) but for the last 14 years Pegunungan Bintang District has submitted financial
statements and in 2019 has obtained a fair opinion with the exception (WDP) of
government financial statements and no significant irregularities can affect
the fairness of financial statements, with the exception of reasonable opinion
(WDP) on the government's financial laoran is very
necessary this research is carried out in Pegunungan
Bintang District (BPK report of Papua Province may 2019).
The
financial report of the Government of Pegunungan
Bintang Regency received a fair opinion with the exception (WDP) so that there
are still issues to be considered, namely Control, Recording and Control of
assets has not been significant. Based on the above background, the titles that
are attached in this study are The Influence of Human Resources Competency,
Internal Control System, Quality of Financial Statements and Application of
Government Accounting Standards to Performance Accountability of Government
Agencies in Pegunungan Bintang Regency.
Agency
theory has the main principle in the form of working relationship between two
parties, namely the party that gives authority (principal) with the party that
receives authority (agency) in a form of cooperation called the "nexus of
contract". The Agent acts as a contracted party by the principal to work
in accordance with the interests of the principal. Agency theory can be interpreted
where there is a relationship between two parties, namely the principal and the
agent who is ordered for a job or service in a contract on behalf of the
principal and gives full freedom to the agent in determining policies that are
beneficial to
principal
(Jensen & Meckling, 1976).
(Jensen & Meckling, 1976)
explain that there is a difference of interest between
the principal and the agent, so that the agent does not always follow the
principal's wishes.
(Udoyono, 2012)
Accountability is the obligation to present and report on the conditions of
accountability in terms of monitoring all actions, in this case actions aimed
at achieving the objectives. Performance benchmarks or accountability indicators
are the obligation of individuals and organizations to explain the results of through objective measurements where possible. In this study, the financial services are considered qualified if transparent and accountable.
Performance
accountability in accordance with LAN is the obligation to give accountability
or answer and explain the performance and actions of an organization's legal
entity/leader to the party that has the right or obligation to hold accountable
or information in all government agencies both central and local government,
departments or state agencies must understand their responsibilities in
accordance with their main duties and responsibilities.
Human
resource competencies, (Halim, 2010)
describe the ability of human resources to fulfill a
given task and responsibility with education, training and experience. Human
resources are the most important organizational element. Therefore, human
resources must be managed in the best way possible so that they can contribute
as well as possible to the achievement of organizational goals. The relationship
between the officer who receives authority from the principal to carry out the
duties in accordance with the interests of the principal is an agency relationship,
so the agent must be responsible to the principal.
Government
Regulation No. 60 of 2008 stipulates that internal control is an integral
process of activities and actions carried out on an ongoing basis to ensure
sufficient trust in achieving organizational objectives through effective and
efficient actions, reliable financial reports, safeguarding of state assets,
actions and compliance with laws and regulations. SPI is a controlling activity
especially for the management of information systems, which aims to ensure the
accuracy and completeness of information.
Internal
control according to (Commission, 1994)
is a process influenced by the board of directors, management
and other personnel designed to provide sufficient confidence in achieving the
effectiveness and operational efficiency of the entity, reliability of
financial statements and compliance with applicable laws. The definition is the
same as the definition of internal control in Government Regulation number 8 of
2006, which is a process influenced by management, designed to provide sufficient
confidence in achieving efficiency, effectiveness, compliance with applicable
laws and applicable reporting, and reliability of the presentation of financial
statements.
METHOD
1. Research Location
This research will be conducted at 13 Regional Device
Organizations (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang Regency,
namely:
Office of Revenue, Financial and Asset Management,
Inspectorate of Pegunungan Bintang District, Regional
Staffing Agency (BKD) of Pegunungan Bintang Regency,
BPSDM
Pegununngan Bintang Regency, Population and Civil Registry Office, Social Service,
Public Works Office, Health Office, BPMPK, Cultural and Tourism Office, Linmas Kesbangkol Agency,
Agriculture, Fisheries, and Livestock Office,BAPPEDA.
2.
Population and Samples
Sampling using Proposive
Sampling method is sampling according to
the criteria set in a data retrieval. The criteria used in sampling are as
follows:
a.
Star Mountains Regional
Device Organization (OPD).
b.
Employees who routinely
carry out inspection duties and have a minimum educational background diploma 3
(D3) Accounting.
c.
Has attended JFA training
(Auditor Functional Department).
d.
Have a minimum work
experience of 1 Year.
3.
Types and Data Sources
In this study the authors used quantitative research in the
form of questionnaires, because the data obtained later in the form of numbers.
From the figures obtained will be further analyzed in the analysis of data. This
research consists of 5 variables, namely Human Resource Competency, Quality of
Financial Statements, Internal Control System, Application of Government
Accounting Standards as free variables (independent), while Performance
Accountability of Government Agencies as dependent variables.
The data used in this study is primary data, primary data
is data obtained by researchers directly by conducting interviews and also
disseminating questionnaire questionnaires. The methods and tools used in this
method of data collection are questionnaires, observations, and literary research
(literature).
4.
Measurement Methods and
Tools
This research uses quantitative analysis method. As
explained by
(Latjandu, Kalangi, & Tinangon, 2016)
that quantitative method can be interpreted as a research
method based on philosophy positivism, used to research on a particular
population or sample, sampling techniques are generally done purposively, data
collection using research instruments, data baseisis
quantitative or statistical with the aim to test the hypothesis that has been
set. Data Analysis Techniques In this study, the analysis techniques used are
multiple linear analysis with the help of SPSS Statistics 16.0 software. The questionnaire used to measure dependent variables is a
questionnaire developed from previous researchers that relates to these
variables.
5.
Data Analysis Methods
a.
Multiple Regression
Analysts
This analysis uses equations to analyze the influence
between independent variables (X1-X4) on variables dependents
(Y). The multiple linear regression models in this study are:
Y
= a + b1 X1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3 + b X4 + e
information:
Y : Government Agency
Performance Accountability
X1 : Human Resources Competency
X2 : Internal Control System
X3 : Financial Report Quality
X4 : Implementation of Government Accounting
Standards
A:
Konstan
b1 : ... b3: Koefisien regresi
e:
Error
b.
Data Instrument Test
Data Instrument Test used in this study is Validity Test and
ReliabilityTest.
c.
Classic Assumption Test
The Classic Assumption Test used in this study is multicolinearity test, heteroskedastisity
test and normality test, and Autocorrelationtest.
d.
Regression Results
The coefficient of determination (R2) is used to measure
how capable the model is of explaining or describing a variation of a dependent
variable. The coefficient of determination is between 0 and 1. When the value
of R2 is small it means that the ability of independent variables (X) to
describe dependent variable variations (Y) is very limited. Likewise, the large
R2 value is the ability of independent variables in describing variations of
large dependent variables Ghozali, (2013).
The F test is used to test whether the regression model
to be studied has significant or insignificant value. In this test the
following hypotheses were used:
�������� H0� : β1 = β2 = β3 = 0
�������� Ha� : β1 ≠ β2 ≠
β3 ≠ 0
�������� F-count = R2/
(k-1): (1-R2)/(n-k)
�������� Where : R2 = Coefficient of determination
�������� K = Estimated
number of parameters including constants
�������� N��
= ���Number
of observations
� ��If the F value is
significant < (α) significance rate of 5% then the regression model has
a good level of model conformity.
� ��If the F value is
significant ≥ (α) significance level of 5% then the regression model
has a bad level of model conformity.
Test t-use to test the significance of the relationship
between variables X and Y, whether independent variables (X) actually affect
dependent (Y) variables separately or partially Ghozali, (2013). This test is used to test the hypotheses of human resource competency
variables, the quality of the finance implementation of government accounting standards and internal control systems.
The hypotheses used in this test are:
Ho: Independent variables (X) have no effect on dependent
variables (Y).
Ha: Independent variables �(X)
have an influence on dependent variables (Y).
�
A.
Result
1.
Questionnaire Distribution
Recapitulation
Table 1
Questionnair Distribution
Recapitulation
|
Distributed questionnaires |
80 Respond |
100% |
|
Incomplete questionnaire |
9 |
11,25% |
|
Questionnaires that fall to no |
14 |
17,5% |
|
Answered |
|
|
|
Questionnaires that can be processed |
57 |
71,25% |
|
Source: Data processed,2020 |
|
|
Based on the table
1, it can be concluded that out of the 80 questionnaires that have been
disseminated. There were 9 questionnaires returned with incomplete conditions
and 14 questionnaires that were not answered, thus qualified questionnaires and
can be processed as many as 57 questionnaires. So that questionnaires
that qualified this study as many as 57 questionnaires or 71.25%.
2.
Data Analysis
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Table
Source: Data processed, 2020.
Based on the table
2, shows that human resource competence has a theoretical range between 27.00
to 40.00 with an average value of 31.9298 and standard deviation of 3.13881. In
the internal control system variables have a theoretical range between 21.00 to
35.00 with an average value of 27.7193 and standard deviation of 2.99258. The
quality of financial statements has a theoretical range between 14.00 to 30.00
with an average value of 24.3333 and standard deviation of 3.59729. the
implementation of government accounting standards has a theoretical range
between 29.00 to 60.00 with an average value of 48.0877 and a standard
deviation of 6.32535. accountability
performance
of government agencies has a theoretical range between 10.00 to 15.00 with an
average value of 12.3860 and standard deviation of 1,634.
3.
Data Quality Test Results
1. Validity Test Results
Validity tests
were conducted with pearson correlation to test the
correlation of each question item score against the variable's total score.
Table 3
Hr Competency Variable
Validity Test (X1)
|
No |
variable |
Person Corelation |
Coefficient of
Significance |
conclusion |
|
1. |
HR Competency X1: |
|
|
|
|
|
X1.1 |
0,579 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.2 |
0,735 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.3 |
0,606 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.4 |
0,589 |
0,005 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.5 |
0,593 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.6 |
0,401 |
0,002 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.7 |
0,568 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.8 |
0,657 |
0,000 |
Valid |
��� ���Source: Data
processed,2020
Based on the table
3 shows that each question item of the HR competency variable (X1) shows a
significant result below 0.05.
Table 4
Internal Control System
Variable Validity Test (X2)
|
No |
Variabel |
Person Corelation |
Coefficient of
Significance |
conclusion |
|
2. |
SPI (X2): |
|
|
|
|
|
X2.1 |
0,760 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.2 |
0,748 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.3 |
0,520 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.4 |
0,532 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.5 |
0,660 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.6 |
0,387 |
0,003 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.7 |
0,757 |
0,000 |
Valid |
��� Source: Data processed, 2020.
Based on the table
4 shows that each question item of the internal control system variable (X2)
shows a significant result below 0.05.
Table 5
Financial Report Quality
Variable Validity Test (X3)
|
No |
Variabel |
Person Corelation |
coefficient Significance |
conclusion |
|
3. |
KLK X3: |
|
|
|
|
|
X3.1 |
0,650 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.2 |
0,868 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.3 |
0,695 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.4 |
0,726 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.5 |
0,823 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.6 |
0,780 |
0,000 |
Valid |
Source: Data processed,
2020.
Based on the table
5 shows that each question item of the financial report quality variable (X3) shows
a significant result below 0.05.
Table 6
Implementation Variable Validity Test
Government Accounting Standards (X4)
|
No |
Variabel |
Person Corelation |
coefficient Significance |
conclusion |
|
4. |
PSAP (X4): |
|
|
|
|
|
X4.1 |
0,635 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.2 |
0,841 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.3 |
0,724 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.4 |
0,678 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.5 |
0,783 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.6 |
0,705 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.7 |
0,855 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.8 |
0,367 |
0,005 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.9 |
0,598 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.10 |
0,685 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.11 |
0,503 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4.12 |
0,664 |
0,000 |
Valid |
Source: Data processed, 2020.
Based
on the table 6 shows that each question item of the government accounting
standard implementation variable (X4) shows a significant result below 0.05.
Table 7
Government Agency Performance
Accountability Variable Validity Test (Y)
|
No |
Variabel |
Person Corelation |
coefficient Significance |
conclusion |
|
5. |
AKIP (Y): |
|
|
|
|
|
X4. 1 |
0,743 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4. 2 |
0,792 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
|
X4. 3 |
0,621 |
0,000 |
Valid |
��� Source: Data processed, 2020.
Based on the table
7 shows that each question item of the government agency performance
accountability variable (Y) showed a significant result below 0.05.
a.
Reliability Test Results
Reliability test
is used to determine the reliable level of a measuring instrument using cronbach alpha formula. A construct or reliable is said to
be reliable if it provides an alpha cronbach value of
>0.60 (Ghozali, 2006).
Table 8
Reliability Test
|
Variable Research |
Cronbach Alpha |
information |
|
HR Competencies |
0,744 |
Reliabel |
|
Internal Control System |
0,754 |
Reliabel |
|
Financial Report Quality |
0,790 |
Reliabel |
|
Implementation of Government Accounting Standards |
0,762 |
Reliabel |
|
Government Agency Performance Accountability |
0,787 |
Reliabel |
�Source: Data processed,
2020.
Based on the table
8 from each variable competency competency HR,
internal control system, quality of financial statements, application of
government accounting standards and performance accountability of government
agencies has a value of Cronbach Alpha > 0.60, thus the data used reliable
and can be continued to conduct multiple linear tests.
4.
Classic Assumption Test
a.
Normality Test
Normality tests
are used to test whether the data used is normally distributed. Good data is to
have a normal distribution. Testing was conducted using the normal curve of the
probabilty plot, provided that the dots on the chart
spread and squeezed following around
diagonal
line then the data used is normally distributed. If on the table test of normality using
Kolmogorov-Smirnov sig value > 0.05, then the data is normally distributed, (Ghozali, 2006).

��������
�
�Source: Data processed,
2020.
The result of the
normal probability plot curve shows that the points on the chart appear to
stick and follow the diagonal line, so that based on the normal curve of the
probability plot, the data used is normally distributed.
Table 9
Kolmogrof Smirnov Test
|
|
Unstandardized Residual |
|
|
N |
|
57 |
|
Normal Parameters |
Mean |
.0000000 |
|
|
Std. Deviation |
.64856347 |
|
Most Extreme
Differences |
Absolute |
.089 |
|
|
Positive |
.089 |
|
|
Negative |
-.087 |
|
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z |
|
.674 |
|
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
.754 |
a.
Test distribution is Normal.
��� Source: Data Processed 2020
In the table 9,
the Kolomorov Smirnov test showed that the residual
data obtained followed the normal distribution, based on the output results
showed a significant Kolmogorov-Smirnov value at 0.754 > 0.05. Thus, residual
data is normally distributed and the regression model has met the assumptions
of normality.
b.
Multikololinearity Test
Multicolinearity is seen from the value of toleance and variance
inflation factor (VIF). Tolerance measures selected independent variability
that other independent variables do not describe. So
the tolance value is low there with a high VIF value.
The common cutoff value used to indicate multiconearity
is a tolerance value < 0.1 or equal to the VIF value > 10 (Ghozali, 2006).
Table 10
Multicolinearity Test
|
Model |
Collinearity Statistics |
|
|
Tolerance |
VIF |
|
|
1.
1 (Constant) |
|
|
|
�� HR Competencies |
.127 |
7.879 |
|
�� SPI |
.139 |
7.212 |
|
�� KLK |
.152 |
6.194 |
|
�� PSAP |
.142 |
4.025 |
a. Dependent Variable : Investment Interest
�� Source: Data processed,
2020.
Based on Table 10
which is the result of multicolinearity, can be seen
the magnitude of each independent variable obtained greater than 0.1 and VIF
(variance inflation factor) smaller than 10, then from the results of toleance and VIF values, can be concluded that there are no
symptoms of multicolinearity in the regression of
this study.
c.
Heterokedastisity Test

Based on the
picture above shows that the dots spread randomly then it can be concluded that
there is no heterokedastisitas in this regression
model.
Table 11
Glejser Test Results
|
Model |
Unstandardized |
Standardized |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
-1.507 |
1.590 |
|
-.948 |
.356 |
|
|
HR Competencies |
-.002 |
.002 |
-1.097 |
-.737 |
.471 |
|
|
SPI |
.068 |
.070 |
.866 |
.971 |
.344 |
|
|
KLK |
-.001 |
.000 |
-.060 |
-.055 |
.957 |
|
|
PSAP |
.012 |
.027 |
.713 |
.552 |
.588 |
a.
Dependent Variable: ABSUi
�� Source: Data processed, 2020.
If the
significance value (Sig) > 0.05 then there is no symptom of Heteroskedastisitas.If the value of significance (Sig) <
0.05 then heteroskedastisitas occurs. Based on the
table above can be known not to occur heterokedastisitas,
this is demonstrated by the value of the significance of human resources
competency variables, internal data generation system, quality of financial
statements and the application of government accounting standards that have
more than 0.05.
5.
Multiple Linear Analysis
Multiple linear
analysis is used to determine the magnitude of the influence of HR
competencies, internal control systems, the quality of financial statements, and
the application of government accounting standards to the accountability of
government agencies' performance. Summary of regression analysis results can be
seen in the followingtable:
Table 11
Regression Analysis
Results Summary
|
Variabel |
coefficient B |
Thitung |
Significant |
information |
|
Constant |
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
HR Competencies |
0,331 |
4,115 |
0,000 |
Significant |
|
SPI |
0,167 |
2,064 |
0,044 |
Significant |
|
KLK |
0,284 |
2,590 |
0,012 |
Significant |
|
PSAP |
0,231 |
3,319 |
0,002 |
Significant |
|
a |
= 0.05 |
|||
|
R |
= .862 |
|||
|
Coefficient of Determination
(R2) |
=.743 |
|||
|
F - count |
= 37,503 |
|||
|
Significant |
=.000 |
|||
|
Ttabel |
= 1,672 |
|||
Source: Data processed,
2020.
The regression
results obtained based on table 4.15 are as follows:
Y = 1,423 + 0,331X1 + 0,167X2 + 0,284X3 +
0,231X4 + e
where:
Y�� : Government Agency Performance �Accountability
X1 : HR Competencies
X2 : Internal Control System
X3 : Financial Report Quality
X4: Implementation of
Government Accounting Standards
A:
1,423
is a constant number which means that if the free variables X1, X2, X3 and X4
are equal to zero, then the magnitude of variable Y (accountability of
government agency performance) is 1,423. In other words, if variables are free
of HUMAN RESOURCES competencies, internal control systems, the quality of financial
statements and the application of government accounting standards are
considered zero meaning the accountability of government agencies' performance
will decrease by 1,423.
�������� B1: 0.331 is the magnitude of
the coefficient of regression of free variables X1 HR competency which means
that any increase (addition) of variable X1 hr
competency will increase the variable bound Y (accountability performance of
government agencies) by 0.331, assuming other free variables are constant. If
the variable competency of human resources there is an increasing tendency of
0.331 then the performance accountability of government agencies will increase
by 0.331. If the human resources competency variable is in decline, then the
accountability of government agencies' performance will also decrease.
�������� B2: 0.167 is the magnitude of
the coefficient of regression of free variables X2 internal control system
which means any increase (addition) of variables X2 internal control system
will increase the variable bound Y (accountability performance of government
agencies) by 0.167, assuming other free variables constant. If the internal control system variable there is an increasing
tendency to 0.167 then the
accountability of the performance of government agencies will increase by 0.167.
If the variables of the internal control system are downward trend, then the
accountability of government agencies' performance will also decrease.
�������� B3: 0.284 is the magnitude of the coefficient of regression of free variables X3
quality financial statements which means any increase (addition) of variables
X3 quality of financial statements will increase the variable bound Y
(accountability performance of government agencies) by 0.284, assuming other
free variables are constant. If the variable quality of financial statements
there is an increasing trend of 0.284 then the performance accountability of
government agencies will increase by 0.284. If the variable quality of
financial statements is in decline, then the accountability of government agencies'
performance will also decrease.
�������� B4: 0.231 is the magnitude of
the coefficient of regression of free variables X4 the application of
government accounting standards which means any increase (addition) of
variables X4 the application of government accounting standards will increase
the variable bound Y (accountability performance of government agencies) by
0.231, assuming other free variables are constant. If the variable
implementation of government accounting standards there is an increasing trend
of 0.231 then the performance accountability of government agencies will
increase by 0.231. If the variable implementation of government accounting
standards is likely to decrease, then the accountability of government
agencies' performance will also decrease.
6.
Hypothesis Test
a.
Coefficient of
Determination
Coefficient
determination test is used to test goodnes-fit and
regression models. In this study the determinant coefficient test was used to
see how much the independent variable was able to explain the dependent
variable.
Table 12
Determination Coefficient
Test Results
|
Model |
R |
R. Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std.Error of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
|
1 |
.862 |
.743 |
.743 |
.67305 |
1.563 |
a. Predictors:
(Constant), PSAP, SPI, Kompetensi SDM, KLK
b.
Dependent Variable: AKIP
Source: Data processed 2020
Based on the table
12, it can be known the magnitude of correlation coefficient (R) of 0.862 which
means that the correlation / relationship between human resources competency
variables, control system quality of financial statements,
and the application of government accounting standards in affecting the
accountability of government agencies performance by 86.2% while adjust R
square value or coefficient of determination value of 0.723 which means that
independent variables (HR competency, internal control system, quality of
financial statements, and application of government accounting standards) are
able to explain dependent variables (accountability of government agencies'
performance) of 72.3% and the rest a of 27.7% can be explained by other factors
outside of this study that were not studied by the authors.
b.
Test Statistics t
This test can be
done by looking at the p-value of each variable. If the p-value� < 0.05 then the hypothesis is accepted and
if the p-value> 0.05 then the hypothesis is not supported (Ghozali, 2006).
Testing the
relationship, used t test, namely by comparing the
value of thitung with ttabel.
Independent variables forming regression models are said to have a significant
effect if thitung > ttabel
or significant levels < α = 0.05. The results of the t statistical test
can be seen in the table below:
Table 13
Individual Parameter Test
Results (t Test)
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
|
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|||
|
1 (Constant) |
1.423 |
.924 |
|
1.540 |
.130 |
|
HR Competencies |
.331 |
.080 |
.813 |
4.115 |
.000 |
|
SPI |
.167 |
.081 |
.390 |
2.064 |
.044 |
|
KLK |
.284 |
.110 |
.798 |
2.590 |
.012 |
|
PSAP |
.231 |
.070 |
1.145 |
3.319 |
.002 |
a.
�Dependent Variable: AKIP
Source: Data processed 2020
Using the help
of softwer SPSS version 21.00, obtained t test
statistics on HR competency (X1) of 4,115 with a significance rate of 0.000.
The statistical value of the thitung test was greater
than the ttabel (4,115 > 1,672) and also
significantly smaller than the α = 0.05. This test showed that Ha was
accepted so that it can be concluded that hr
competencies have a significant effect on the performance accountability of
government agencies in the Regional Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang District.
The internal
control system variable t test statistic (X2) was obtained at 2,064 with a
significance rate of 0.044. The statistical value of the test was greater than
the ttabel (2,064 > 1,672) and also significantly
smaller than the α = 0.05. This test showed that Ha was accepted so that
it can be concluded that the internal control system has a significant effect
on the performance accountability of government agencies in the Regional Device
Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang District.
Statistical test t
variable quality of financial statements (X3) obtained by 2,590 with a
significance rate of 0.012. The statistical value of the test was greater than
the 1,672 > (2,590) and was also significantly smaller than the α =
0.05. This test shows that Ha was accepted so that it can be concluded that the
quality of financial statements has a significant impact on the performance
accountability of government agencies at the Regional Device Organization (OPD)
in Pegunungan Bintang District.
Statistics t
variable test implementation of government accounting standards (X4) obtained
by 3,319 with a significance rate of 0.002. The statistical value of the thitung test was greater than the ttabel
(3,319 > 1,672) and also significantly smaller than the α = 0.05. This
test shows that Ha is accepted so that it can be concluded that the
implementation of government accounting standards has a significant effect on
the accountability of the performance of the.
B.
Discussion
1.
The Effect of HUMAN
RESOURCES Competency on Performance Accountability of Government Agencies in
Regional Device Organizations (OPD) in Pegunungan
Bintang District.
Based on the
results of the data analysis, it is known that the value of statistic t test
against hr competency variable (X1) is 4,115 with a
significance level of 0.000. This test showed that Ha was accepted so that it
can be concluded that hr competencies have a
significant effect on the performance accountability of government agencies in
the Regional Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan
Bintang District.
The results of
this study are in line with the results of the (Mahardini & Miranti, 2018) the results of his research showed that human resource competence positively
affects the accountability of the performance of government agencies. Other
research conducted by (Karsana & Suaryana, 2017) demonstrate that human resource competence has a positive and significant
effect on the accountability of the performance of government agencies.
2.
Effect of Internal
Control System on Performance Accountability of Government Agencies on Regional
Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang
District.
From the results
of the data analysis, it is known that the test value of the system variable t
test statistics internal control (X2) was
obtained by 2,064 with a significance rate of 0.044. This test showed that Ha
was accepted so that it can be concluded that the internal control system has a
significant effect on the performance accountability of government agencies in
the Regional Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan
Bintang District.
The results of
this study are in line with the results of the (Merawati1 & Putra, 2015) that internal control systems
have a significant impact on government Performance Accountability. Research (Holle, Salle, & Sanggenafa, 2019) stated that the internal
control system has a significant effect on the accountability of the
performance of government agencies.
3.
Effect of Financial
Report Quality on Government Agency Performance Accountability on Regional
Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang
District
From the results
of the data analysis, it is known that the value of t statistical test against
the quality variable of financial statements (X3) obtained t test statistics of
2,590 with a significance rate of 0.012. This test shows that Ha was accepted
so that it can be concluded that the quality of financial statements has a
significant impact on the accountability of the performance of government
agencies at the Regional Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan
Bintang District.
This research is
in line with research from (Fitriyani & Herawati, 2019) stating that the Quality of Financial Statements has a significant impact
on the Accountability of Government Performance. Other research conducted by (Budiantara, 2015) proving that government accounting standards affect the accountability of
government performance.
4.
Effect of Government
Accounting Standards On Accountability of Government
Agencies' Performance in Regional Device Organizations (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang District.
From the results
of the data analysis, it is known that the value of t statistical test against
the variable application of government accounting standards (X4) obtained t
test statistics of 3,319 with a significance rate of 0.002. This test shows
that Ha was accepted so that it can be concluded that the application of
government accounting standards significant impact on the
performance accountability of government agencies in the Regional Device
Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang District.
These results are
in line with research (Fitriyani & Herawati, 2019) which states that the implementation of accrual-based government accounting
standards has a significant effect on the Performance Accountability of
Government Agencies.
5.
Effect of implementation
of government accounting standards, Internal Control system, quality of
financial statements and human resource competency on Performance
Accountability of government agencies in Regional Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang District.
The results of the
data analysis, known statistical test value f to variable application of
government accounting standards, internal control system, quality of financial
statements and human resources competency to the accountability of the
performance of government agencies obtained f test statistics of 37,503 with a
significance level of 0.000. This test shows that Ha is accepted so that it can
be concluded that the application of government accounting standards, internal
control systems, quality of financial statements and human resource
competencies affect the accountability of the performance of government
agencies in the Regional Device Organization (OPD) in Pegunungan
Bintang District. In addition, the result
of the coefficient of determination (R Square) was obtained a relationship
density value of 0.723 or 72.3%. It means that the implementation of government
accounting standards, internal control systems, quality of financial statements
and human resource competencies are able to contribute greatly to the accountability
of the performance of government agencies in the Regional Device Organization
(OPD) in Pegunungan Bintang Regency.
CONCLUSION
HR
competence has a significant effect on the performance accountability of
government agencies in Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD) in the Bintang
Mountains Regency. The internal control system has a significant effect on the
accountability of the performance of government agencies in Regional Apparatus
Organizations (OPD) in the Bintang Mountains Regency. The quality of financial
reports has a significant effect on the accountability of the performance of
government agencies in Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD) in the Bintang
Mountains Regency. The application of government accounting standards has a
significant effect on the accountability of the performance of government
agencies in Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD) in the Bintang Mountains
Regency. The application of government accounting standards, internal control
systems, quality of financial reports and human resource competencies affect
the accountability of government agencies' performance in Regional Apparatus
Organizations (OPD) in the Bintang Mountains Regency
REFERENCES
Budiantara, Nugraen dan M. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Standar Akuntansi
Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan dan Implikasinya Terhadap
Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Universitas Komputer Indonesia. Goggle Scholer
Fitriyani, Novita, & Herawati, Helmi. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan
Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah Berbasis Akrual, Sistem Pengendalian Intern Dan
Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
(Studi Kasus Inspektorat Kabupaten Bengkulu Tengah). JAZ: Jurnal Akuntansi
Unihaz, 2(2), 19�35.Google Scholer
Ghozali. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS.
Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP. In Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS.Google Scholer
Halim. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Akuntansi Biaya Edisi 4. BPFE. Yogyakarta.Google Scholer
Holle, Vania Annissa, Salle, Agustinus, & Sanggenafa, Mariolin.
(2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Berbasis Akrual,
Sistem Pengendalian Intern Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Laporan
Keuangan (Studi Kasus Pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Provinsi Papua). Jurnal
Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Daerah, 14(1), 16�35.Google Scholer
Jensen, Michael C. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4),
305�360.Google Scholer
Karsana, I. Wayan, & Suaryana, I. Gusti Ngurah Agung. (2017). Pengaruh
Efektivitas Penerapan Sap, Kompetensi Sdm, dan Spi Pada Kualitas Laporan
Keuangan Pemerintah Kabupaten Bangli. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana,
21(1), 643�670.Google Scholer
Latjandu, Imelda, Kalangi, Lintje, & Tinangon, Jantje J. (2016). Faktor-Faktor
yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Kabupaten
Kepulauan Talaud. Accountability, 5(2), 98�109.Google Scholar
Mahardini, Nikke Yusnita, & Miranti, Ade. (2018). Dampak Penerapan
Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan dan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia pada Kualitas
Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Provinsi Banten Tahun Anggaran 2015. JAK (Jurnal
Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5 (1), 22�32.Google Scholer
Merawati1, Luh Komang, & Putra, I. Putu Mega Juli Semara. (2015).
Kemampuan Pelatihan Pasar Modal Memoderasi Pengaruh Pengetahuan Investasi Dan
Penghasilan Pada Minat Berinvestasi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan
Bisnis, 10 (2).Google Scholer
Riantiarno, Reynaldi, & Azlina, Nur. (2011). Factors Affecting
Accountability of Performance of Government Agencies (Study on Regional Work
Units of Rokan Hulu Regency). Pekbis Jurnal, 3 (3), 560�568.Google Scholar
Udoyono, Kodar. (2012). E-procurement dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa
untuk Mewujudkan Akuntabilitas di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan,
3(1).Google Scholer
|
Copyright holder
: Ramasoyan, Pascalina Van Sweet Sesa, Kurniawan Patma, Rudiawie Larasati (2021) |
|
First
publication right : |
|
This
article is licensed under: |